Thanks for adding the reference. I think you need to describe what the compensation transaction is exactly and give an example. The current explain is quite vague. I.e. I don't understand what does it mean for one transaction to compensate another transaction.
Thanks for adding the reference. I think you need to describe what the compensation transaction is exactly and give an example. The current explain is quite vague. I.e. I don't understand what does it mean for one transaction to compensate another transaction.
The author of the article does not need to describe nor explain what saga is or what compensation transaction is because this is not what this article is about. The article is about introducing readers to the architecture behind the scene. Neo has since added links for people who are interested in learning more can have a starting point.
Yes, the author can do whatever he likes, however he likes. And what I'm saying is that I got disappointed that while reading the article, I didn't get the solution. Thus it looked like a click bait article to me.
The author could've just said - "Halo used the Saga pattern. References: ...". In which case I would've been OK by just providing the references. But the author took his time to write down part of the explanation of what the saga pattern is about. And since he took his time to do that, I took my time to write down that the explanation was partial and I didn't get the explanation.
However, I am glad that he provided a lot of references and I'm going through them at the moment. The references are explaining quite well what the saga pattern is. The references also lead to other quite useful articles.
Once I'm done with reading the references I might add a better comment. My comment was solely about the article itself.
Thanks for adding the reference. I think you need to describe what the compensation transaction is exactly and give an example. The current explain is quite vague. I.e. I don't understand what does it mean for one transaction to compensate another transaction.
The author of the article does not need to describe nor explain what saga is or what compensation transaction is because this is not what this article is about. The article is about introducing readers to the architecture behind the scene. Neo has since added links for people who are interested in learning more can have a starting point.
Yes, the author can do whatever he likes, however he likes. And what I'm saying is that I got disappointed that while reading the article, I didn't get the solution. Thus it looked like a click bait article to me.
The author could've just said - "Halo used the Saga pattern. References: ...". In which case I would've been OK by just providing the references. But the author took his time to write down part of the explanation of what the saga pattern is about. And since he took his time to do that, I took my time to write down that the explanation was partial and I didn't get the explanation.
However, I am glad that he provided a lot of references and I'm going through them at the moment. The references are explaining quite well what the saga pattern is. The references also lead to other quite useful articles.
Once I'm done with reading the references I might add a better comment. My comment was solely about the article itself.